The Mechanism Through Which AI Algorithmic Recommendations Influence Users’ Behavioral Intentions: A Comparative Analysis of Consumption and Public Health Service Contexts

The Mechanism Through Which AI Algorithmic Recommendations Influence Users’ Behavioral Intentions: A Comparative Analysis of Consumption and Public Health Service Contexts

Authors

  • Wei Zhu School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi Polytechnic University, Jiujiang 332005, Jiangxi, China
  • Ping Ouyang School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi Polytechnic University, Jiujiang 332005, Jiangxi, China
  • Xiuting Mei School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi Polytechnic University, Jiujiang 332005, Jiangxi, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/ijomsr.2026.09(05).01

Keywords:

AI algorithmic recommendation, User behavioral intention, User trust, Perceived usefulness, Public health services, PLS-SEM

Abstract

With the widespread application of AI algorithmic recommendations on digital platforms, their influence on users’ behavioral decision-making has attracted increasing scholarly attention. Based on the stimulus–organism–response framework, the technology acceptance model, and trust theory, this study constructs a research model to examine how AI algorithmic recommendations affect users’ behavioral intentions, and further conducts a comparative analysis between consumption and public health service contexts. Questionnaire data were collected from 312 valid respondents, and partial least squares structural equation modeling and multi-group analysis were employed for empirical testing. The results show that recommendation accuracy and recommendation transparency significantly enhance user trust, while recommendation reliability significantly strengthens perceived usefulness. Both user trust and perceived usefulness have significant positive effects on behavioral intention and play mediating roles between algorithmic recommendation characteristics and behavioral intention. Further analysis reveals that the consumption context relies more heavily on personalized recommendations and interest matching, whereas the public health service context depends more strongly on the professionalism and reliability of recommendation systems as well as trust mechanisms. This study enriches research on AI algorithmic recommendations from a context-comparative perspective and provides practical implications for optimizing recommendation mechanisms on digital platforms and promoting intelligent governance in public health services.

References

Benbasat, I., & Wang, W. (2005). Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(3), 72–101.

Chew, H. S. J., Achananuparp, P., & Periaswamy, S. (2022). Perceptions and needs of artificial intelligence in health care to increase adoption: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(1), e32939. https://doi.org/10.2196/32939

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015). Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000033

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer. https://do i.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304

Kauttonen, J., Rousi, R., & Alamäki, A. (2025). Trust and acceptance challenges in the adoption of AI applications in health care: Quantitative survey analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e65567. https://doi.org/10.2196/65567

Knijnenburg, B. P., Willemsen, M. C., Gantner, Z., Soncu, H., & Newell, C. (2012). Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 22(4–5), 441–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-011-9118-4

Komiak, S. Y. X., & Benbasat, I. (2006). The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 941–960. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148760

Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2012). Recommender systems: From algorithms to user experience. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 22(1–2), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-011-9112-x

Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A., & Moore, D. A. (2019). Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005

Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press.

Qin, H. (2024). Examining the impact of personalization and carefulness in AI-generated health advice: Trust, adoption, and insights in online healthcare consultations. Telematics and Informatics, 93, 102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102174

Qin, M., Zhu, W., Zhao, S., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Is artificial intelligence better than manpower? The effects of different types of online customer services on customer purchase intentions. Sustainability, 14(7), 3974. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073974

Rosenbacke, R., Melhus, Å., McKee, M., & Stuckler, D. (2024). How explainable artificial intelligence can increase or decrease clinicians’ trust in AI applications in health care: Systematic review. JMIR AI, 3, e53207. https://doi.org/10.2196/53207

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 587–632). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15

Shin, D. (2020). User perceptions of algorithmic decisions in the personalized AI system: Perceptual evaluation of fairness, accountability, transparency, and explainability. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(4), 541–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1843357

Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Wang, W., & Benbasat, I. (2007). Recommendation agents for electronic commerce: Effects of explanation facilities on trusting beliefs. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 217–246. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230410

Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2007). E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 137–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148784

Xu, Y., & Chen, L. (2025). Personalized recommendations and consumer trust: The role of perceived control and locus of control. Acta Psychologica, 261, 105936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105936

Zhang, B., & Sundar, S. S. (2019). Proactive versus reactive personalization: Can customization of privacy enhance user experience? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 128, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.03.002

Zhang, X., Guo, X., Lai, K. H., Guo, F., & Li, C. (2014). Understanding gender differences in m-health adoption: A modified theory of reasoned action model. Telemedicine and e-Health, 20(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0092

Zhang, Y., & Chen, X. (2020). Explainable recommendation: A survey and new perspectives. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 14(1), 1–101. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000066

Zhao, Y., Wang, A., & Sun, Y. (2020). Technological environment, virtual experience, and MOOC continuance: A stimulus–organism–response perspective. Computers & Education, 144, 103721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103721

Zhou, T. (2011). Examining the critical success factors of mobile website adoption. Online Information Review, 35(4), 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521111161972

Zhou, T. (2013). An empirical examination of continuance intention of mobile payment services. Decision Support Systems, 54(2), 1085–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.034

Zhu, W., Ouyang, P., & Kong, M. (2024). Research on the evolution mechanism of intelligent manufacturing transformation of Chinese pharmaceutical manufacturing enterprises based on system dynamics. Heliyon, 10(13), e33825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33825

Zhu, W., Ouyang, P., Ke, X., Qiu, S., Li, S., & Jiang, Z. (2024). NK model simulation study of intelligent manufacturing transformation path selection in pharmaceutical manufacturing enterprises. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 19646. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70567-2

Zhu, Y. Q., & Chang, J. H. (2016). The key role of relevance in personalized advertisement: Examining its impact on perceptions of privacy invasion, self-awareness, and continuous use intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 442–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.048

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...