Research on the Construction Pathway of Grassroots Governance Program Clusters Based on Job Competency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/ijomsr.2025.08(10).05Keywords:
Job Competency, Grassroots Governance Program Clusters, Talent Cultivation, Competency ModelAbstract
In response to the new demands for professionals brought by the modernization of grassroots social governance in the new era and addressing the current disconnection between the cultivation of grassroots governance talents and actual job requirements, this paper introduces the job competency theory to construct a comprehensive competency model for grassroots governance program clusters. Through methods such as job analysis, behavioral event interviews, and questionnaire surveys, the research identifies core competency elements spanning dimensions like political caliber, policy implementation, community engagement, emergency management, and digital application. Building on this foundation, the study systematically proposes four core construction pathways: optimizing the talent cultivation system, developing dual-qualified (practice-oriented) teaching staff, reforming the governance structure of program clusters, and enhancing resource integration and sharing. This research aims to provide a theoretical basis and practical paradigm for the development of grassroots governance-related program clusters in application-oriented undergraduate institutions, thereby achieving a seamless alignment between talent cultivation and job requirements, and ultimately supporting the modernization of grassroots governance systems and capabilities.
References
Li, F., & Liu, J. (2025). The connotation, logic, and practical strategies of advancing the great social revolution in the new era. Journal of Ideological Education Studies, (05), 11–19.
Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. (2019, November 6). Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on some major issues concerning upholding and improving the socialist system with Chinese characteristics, advancing the modernization of China's governance system and governance capacity. People's Daily, p. 001.
Yang, L., & Xu, X. D. (2020). Problem orientation, structural function, and path selection of city-level social governance. Reform, (06), 19–29.
Hu, R. J. (2024). An analysis of the evolution trend and new dynamics of risk sources of social conflict at the county level. CASS Journal of Political Science, (01), 153–166+309.
Wu, X. L., & Li, J. P. (2025). Building connected communities: The practical path and direction of “future communities”. Governance Studies, 41(04), 58–73+158.
Long, T. (2025). Construction and implementation of professional career path maps based on job competency models. China University Students Career Guide, (02), 3–13.
He, D. G., & Li, R. F. (2025). Holistic governance: An explanation of the integration of “tiao” and “kuai” at the county level—Taking the “Hanyin practice” of township social governance innovation and reform as an example. Local Governance Research, (04), 28–40+78.
Huang, Z. J., Wang, X. Y., Zhang, J., et al. (2024). A written discussion on “cultivating social and emotional competence”. Basic Education, 21(05), 16–37.
Liu, S. L., Lai, Y. Z., & Chen, L. (2023). Characteristics, elements, and construction pathways of internationally advanced vocational program clusters. Modern Education Management, (10), 116–128.