Study on Tax Governance of Data Assets in the Context of Digital Economy

Study on Tax Governance of Data Assets in the Context of Digital Economy

Authors

  • Liang Gong PwC Tax Agents (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Shanghai, 200000, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/ijomsr.2023.06(06).05

Keywords:

Tax Treatment, Digital Economy, Data Assets, Tax Administration

Abstract

With the rapid development of the digital economy, data assets have become an important part of enterprises, and the scale of China's digital economy will reach 50.2 trillion yuan in 2022, with the total amount ranking the second in the world, and the proportion of GDP rising to 41.5 per cent, making the digital economy an important engine for stable growth and transformation. In this context, the traditional tax system is difficult to adapt to the rapid change and development of the digital economy, and China's tax policy is facing a major challenge. Based on the current situation that the tax treatment mechanism of data assets in the traditional economic model has been impacted and the phenomenon of tax loss has become increasingly serious, this paper takes today's tax collection and management standards as the starting point, explores the reasons for the mismatch between them and the data assets, and puts forward the conception of the specific application framework and the corresponding suggestions.

References

Pin W , Linlin X , Di W . Corporate Tax Integrity and the Market Reactions to Covid-19: Evidence from China [J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2022, 58 (1): 24-34.

Afif K , Rebolledo C , Roy J . Evaluating the effectiveness of the weight-based packaging tax on the reduction at source of product packaging: The case of food manufacturers and retailers [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2022, 245 (prepublish): 108391.

Cara T . Investigating the impact of country-by-country reporting on effective tax rates: Exploratory evidence from listed South African multinational groups [J]. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 2022, 36 (1): 45-56.

Linda D , James A , Erich K . Inequitable wages and tax evasion [J]. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2021, (prepublish): 101811.

Iftekhar H , Incheol K , Haimeng T , et al. The Effect of Foreign Institutional Ownership on Corporate Tax Avoidance: International Evidence [J]. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 2021, (prepublish): 100440.

Ping Z , Yilin H , Bo L . Impacts of Property Tax Levy on Housing Price and Rent: Theoretical Models and Simulation with Insights on the Timing of China Adopting the Property Tax [J]. China Finance and Economic Review, 2021, 10 (3): 47-66.

Tao C , Youchao T , Jinghua W , et al. The Unintended Consequence of Land Finance: Evidence from Corporate Tax Avoidance [J]. Management Science, 2021.

Chatib M B , Mayara F , Rema H , et al. Tax Administration versus Tax Rates: Evidence from Corporate Taxation in Indonesia [J]. American Economic Review, 2021, 111 (12): 3827-3871.

Ngozi P J , Onyinyechi C O . Governance Quality and Tax Revenue Mobilization in Nigeria [J]. Journal of Legal Studies, 2021, 28 (42): 1-41.

Roberto S , Hannah F . Tax Equality for Immigrants: The Indispensable Ingredient for Remedying Child Poverty in the United States [J]. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 2021, 9 (4): 251-270.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29
Loading...