Mechanisms and Pathways for Advancing Rural Revitalization: A Theoretically Grounded Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/ijomsr.2026.09(02).06Keywords:
Digital Technology, Rural Revitalization, Agricultural and Rural DevelopmentAbstract
Rural revitalization represents both a critical strategy for addressing challenges related to agriculture, rural areas, and farmers, and the overarching objective of poverty alleviation efforts. In the contemporary context, various forms of digital technology are increasingly being integrated into rural development, thereby consolidating poverty alleviation outcomes and providing a robust technological foundation for rural revitalization. Within this process, digital technologies play a pivotal role in facilitating the realization of rural revitalization goals. Against this backdrop, this study focuses on digital technology as the central object of inquiry, with particular emphasis on examining the underlying mechanisms and implementation pathways through which digital technology empowers rural revitalization. Specifically, this paper develops a Cost-Benefit Optimization Model for cascade reservoirs to identify the most economically viable site selection schemes. Furthermore, the Simplified Triangle Method for Flood Routing is employed to estimate the maximum and minimum discharge capacity of each dam, thereby informing the formulation of differentiated management strategies tailored to specific months and locations for the Zambezi River Authority (ZRA).
References
Yang Zhiping. the internal logic and realistic choice of digital empowerment for rural industry revitalization [J]. Journal of Hubei University of Economics (Humanities and Social Sciences edition), 202, 19(03):32-36.
Kong Suyan. Path selection of rural revitalization empowered by digital technology [J]. Cooperative Economics and Science and Technology, 2021, (22):30- 32.
Ding Shihua. Journal of Hubei University of Arts and Sciences. Digital culture governance empowers rural culture revitalization [J]. 2020(04).
Markowitz, Harry M:Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, Vol.7 (1952) No.1,p. 77‐91.
Sharpe, William F. Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance, Vol.19(1964) No.3,p. 425‐442.
Ross, Stephen A:The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing,Journal of Economic Theory, Vol.13(1976) No.5,p. 341‐360.
Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French:Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.33 (1993) No.1,p.3‐56.
Jegadeesh, Narasimhan and Sheridan Titman: Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. The Journal of Finance, Vol.48 (1993) No.1,p. 65‐91.
Carhart, Mark M:On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance, The Journal of Finance, Vol.52 (1997) No.1,p.57‐82.
Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French.:A Five‐Factor Asset Pricing Model,Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.116 (2015) No.1,p.1‐22.
Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French:Dissecting Anomalies with a Five‐factor Model, Review of Financial Studies, Vol.29 (2016) No.1,p.69‐103.
Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French:Choosing Factors,Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.128(2018) No.1,p.234‐252.
Baker.M,Wurgler.J:Investor Sentiment and the Cross‐Section of Stock Returns,The Jounral of Finance, Vol.61(2006) No.4,p.1647‐1680.
Famaef, French.K.R: Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.33 (1993) No.1,p.3‐56.
Ma Qiang:Margin trading, stock index and investor sentiment,Accounting monthly, Vol.11 (2006) No.4,p.124‐128.