The Missing Carbon Dimension in ESG Evaluation Systems under Carbon Neutrality Targets: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis

The Missing Carbon Dimension in ESG Evaluation Systems under Carbon Neutrality Targets: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Authors

  • Yiting Chen College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, PR China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/wjimt.2026.09(05).03

Keywords:

Carbon neutrality, ESG, Dual-carbon targets, Bibliometrics, Assessment framework, Low-carbon transition

Abstract

Against the backdrop of global climate governance and China’s dual-carbon targets, carbon neutrality has become a systemic agenda linking energy transition, industrial upgrading, and governance transformation. ESG assessment is increasingly connected with carbon governance, disclosure, and low-carbon transition. However, existing ESG rating systems usually place carbon-related indicators under the environmental pillar, lacking an independent carbon-neutrality perspective and thus limiting their ability to capture firms’ heterogeneous carbon-governance capabilities. Based on a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of Web of Science and CNKI publications, this study finds that research at the ESG–carbon neutrality nexus has shifted from general corporate responsibility assessment toward climate governance and low-carbon transition. Current studies mainly focus on ESG governance and corporate transition, carbon disclosure and capital-market responses, and green finance and resource allocation. Future research should develop carbon-neutrality-oriented ESG assessment frameworks, strengthen the identification of substantive emission-reduction performance, and expand empirical evidence through larger samples and policy-evaluation designs.

References

Alsayegh, M. F., et al. (2020). Corporate governance and sustainability: A systematic review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3200-3215.

Avramov, D., et al. (2022). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 642-664.

Berg, F., Kolbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344.

Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, & State Council. (2021). Opinions on fully, accurately, and comprehensively implementing the new development philosophy and doing a good job in carbon peaking and carbon neutrality [Policy document; in Chinese].

Central University of Finance and Economics, International Institute of Green Finance. (2022). China ESG development report 2022 [Report; in Chinese].

Chen, Y., & Gu, Y. (2022). Digital transformation and carbon emissions: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. China Industrial Economics, (12), 61-79. [in Chinese]

Dong, M., et al. (2022). Carbon neutrality strategy and sustainable development: The role of board human capital and knowledge sharing. Journal of Business Research, 148, 51-66.

Du, H., et al. (2022). ESG performance and carbon disclosure quality of Chinese energy companies. Energy Policy, 165, Article 112914.

Fan, J. L., et al. (2021). Carbon capture and storage (CCUS) in China: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151, Article 111567.

FTSE Russell. (2022). FTSE ESG ratings methodology [Report].

Gao, J., et al. (2021). ESG performance and stock returns. Journal of Financial Research, (9), 152-170. [in Chinese]

Gao, M., et al. (2022). Green finance supporting carbon neutrality: Theoretical mechanisms and implementation pathways. Journal of Financial Research, (4), 114-132. [in Chinese]

Gao, Y., et al. (2023). Digital transformation and corporate carbon emissions: The mediating role of information asymmetry and operational efficiency. Energy Economics, 126, Article 106899.

Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. (2021). Global sustainable investment review 2020 [Report].

He, W. (2023). Corporate sustainable development and the realization of carbon-neutrality targets from an ESG perspective. China Industrial Economics, (3), 175-192. [in Chinese]

Hu, J., et al. (2023). ESG ratings and corporate financing constraints. Journal of Financial Research, (5), 114-131. [in Chinese]

Huang, S. (2021). New developments in international financial reporting sustainability disclosure standards. Finance and Accounting Monthly, (24), 3-7. [in Chinese]

Huang, S. (2022a). Evaluating corporate sustainability capability from an ESG perspective. Finance and Accounting Monthly, (15), 3-11. [in Chinese]

Huang, S. (2022b). Greenwashing and anti-greenwashing in ESG reports. Finance and Accounting Monthly, (1), 3-11. [in Chinese]

Huang, S. (2022c). ESG and corporate value creation: Theoretical mechanisms and empirical evidence. Accounting Research, (5), 3-16. [in Chinese]

Huang, S. (2023). Reconstruction of ESG evaluation systems in the context of carbon neutrality. Finance and Accounting Monthly, (8), 3-10. [in Chinese]

Huazheng Index. (2022). Huazheng ESG rating methodology [Report; in Chinese].

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Green Finance Research Group. (2021). Construction and application of the ICBC ESG evaluation system. Finance Forum, (6), 3-12. [in Chinese]

Keerthana, S., et al. (2023). Green innovation and governance mechanisms for carbon neutrality: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 415, Article 137912.

Li, X., & Yang, G. (2023). Synergy between corporate carbon-neutrality strategy and ESG governance. Management World, 39(8), 156-172. [in Chinese]

Li, X., & Yang, G. (2024). Corporate carbon disclosure and real emission-reduction performance: Alignment or divergence? Management World, 40(2), 134-152. [in Chinese]

Li, X., Yang, G., & Rao, P. (2023). Stock-exchange inquiry-letter pressure and ESG information disclosure. Management World, 39(5), 175-191. [in Chinese]

Li, Y. (2023). ESG investment and carbon economy development. Energy Economics, 126, Article 106856.

Lin, B. (2021). Key dimensions and technical pathways for carbon neutrality in the power sector. China Industrial Economics, (5), 5-23. [in Chinese]

Lin, B., et al. (2022). Carbon-neutrality pathways for the power sector. Economic Research Journal, 57(8), 4-21. [in Chinese]

Liu, C. (2023). Board foreign experience and corporate carbon emissions: The mediating role of green innovation. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, Article 101930.

Liu, H. (2022). ESG disclosure quality and corporate financing costs: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 74, Article 101792.

Lokuwaduge, C. S. D. S., et al. (2022). ESG and sustainability: The role of stakeholders in Australian metal and mining industry. Resources Policy, 78, Article 102964.

Ma, J. (2021). Pathways and mechanisms through which green finance supports carbon neutrality. Journal of Financial Research, (6), 1-15. [in Chinese]

Ma, X., et al. (2021). Green finance development and ESG investment practices. Journal of Financial Research, (8), 1-17. [in Chinese]

Ministry of Ecology and Environment. (2025). Work plan for expanding the national carbon emissions trading market to cover the steel, cement, and aluminum smelting industries [Policy document; in Chinese].

MSCI. (2022). MSCI ESG ratings methodology [Report].

People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, & China Securities Regulatory Commission. (2021). Green bond endorsed projects catalogue (2021 edition) [Policy document; in Chinese].

RKS Global. (2021). RKS Global ESG rating system [Report; in Chinese].

State Council. (2024a). Interim regulations on the administration of carbon emissions trading [Policy document; in Chinese].

State Council. (2024b). Opinions on accelerating the comprehensive green transition of economic and social development [Policy document; in Chinese].

State Council. (2026). Outline of the national economic and social development plan of the People's Republic of China for the Fifteenth Five-Year Plan period [Policy document; in Chinese].

Sustainalytics. (2022). ESG risk ratings methodology [Report].

SynTao Green Finance. (2020). Research on China's ESG rating system [Report; in Chinese].

SynTao Green Finance. (2021). SynTao Green Finance ESG rating methodology [Report; in Chinese].

Tao, W., & Jin, Z. (2015). Corporate governance and corporate sustainable development. Chinese Journal of Management, 12(3), 389-397. [in Chinese]

Theyel, G. (2000). Management practices for environmental innovation and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(2), 249-266.

United Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

United Nations. (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

United Nations. (2015). Paris Agreement.

Wang, B., et al. (2022). ESG performance and corporate operating performance. Management Review, 34(9), 76-87. [in Chinese]

Wang, X., et al. (2021). Technical pathways for achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutrality in the steel industry. Iron & Steel, 56(11), 1-8. [in Chinese]

Wang, X., et al. (2022). Comparative analysis of carbon-emission intensity among domestic and international steel enterprises. Iron & Steel, 57(2), 1-10. [in Chinese]

Wang, Y., et al. (2023). Digital transformation and green governance: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, Article 122299.

Xi, J. (2020a, September 23). Statement at the general debate of the 75th session of the United Nations General Assembly. People's Daily. [in Chinese]

Xi, J. (2020b, December 13). Statement at the Climate Ambition Summit. People's Daily. [in Chinese]

Xi, L., & Zhao, H. (2022a). The impact mechanism of ESG performance on corporate value. Economic and Management Research, 43(5), 121-133. [in Chinese]

Xi, L., & Zhao, H. (2022b). Corporate ESG performance and sustainable development capability. Business Management Journal, 44(5), 102-121. [in Chinese]

Xi, L., & Zhao, H. (2022c). ESG performance and stock-price volatility. Securities Market Herald, (3), 13-23. [in Chinese]

Xi, L., & Zhao, H. (2023). Regional differences and industry heterogeneity in corporate ESG performance. Economic Geography, 43(5), 108-118. [in Chinese]

Zhang, Q., et al. (2023). Carbon-emissions trading pilot policy and corporate ESG performance. Economic Research Journal, 58(4), 89-106. [in Chinese]

Zhang, Q., et al. (2024). The influence mechanisms of dual-carbon policy instruments on corporate green transformation. China Industrial Economics, (1), 78-96. [in Chinese]

Zhang, X., et al. (2023). ESG performance and corporate market value. Business Management Journal, 45(2), 45-62. [in Chinese]

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...