News Framework of China and the Philippines on the South China Sea Issue: Taking China Daily and Manila Times as Examples

News Framework of China and the Philippines on the South China Sea Issue: Taking China Daily and Manila Times as Examples

Authors

  • Chengcheng Zhang School of Foreign Language, Hubei University of Automotive Technology 3School of Foreign Languages, University of Sanya
  • Junchao Ren School of Foreign Language, Hubei University of Automotive Technology
  • Xue Ma School of Foreign Languages, University of Sanya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/ijomsr.2024.07(01).07

Keywords:

South China Sea Issue, News Framework, China Daily, Manila Times, Communication Discourse Structure

Abstract

The South China Sea issue is a national territorial issue and an international dispute that affects the peace, stability and security of the world. During this period, the news organizations of both countries have also given many descriptions of this dispute. Therefore, this paper compares the differences in the descriptions of the dispute between the two countries by studying the reporting frameworks of news organizations representative of the two countries, and the China Dailyand Manila Times was selected for this study.on the South China Sea dispute between China and the Philippines from 2013 to 2015 as samples, to examine the characteristics and differences of newspaper frameworks constructed by newspapers in China and the Philippines. This study demonstrated through framework analysis that China's external communication structure in this conflict is sovereignty, resolute defense, accountability, problem-solving, and non acceptance of arbitration. This article also studied the reports on the conflict between China and the Philippines by China Daily and Manila Times at the same time. It was found that although China Daily presented a relatively complete news schema, its overall structure was more formulaic and singular. Compared with the reports on the Philippines, it was found that the specific content was insufficient and had a distinct emotional color. A panoramic schematic structure should be constructed afterwards to showcase the specific process, in order to better spread China's voice to the world and guide international public opinion.

References

Linjing C. A study on the theoretical framework of discourse analysis of china’s response to Sino-US trade frictions[J]. SAGE Open, 2022, 12(1): 21582440-221086656.

Moscato D, Valencia R. Global Narratives of Ecological Modernization: The Construction of Climate Change op-eds in China Daily and the New York Times[J]. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 2023: 26(2):2311-1969.

Fawzi N, Steindl N, Obermaier M, et al. Concepts, causes and consequences of trust in news media–a literature review and framework[J]. Annals of the International Communication Association, 2021, 45(2): 154-174.

Sumarlan S, SUDIBJO A G. Indonesia defence diplomacy strategy in resolving china claims to Indonesia exclusive economic zone in north natuna sea[J]. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government| Vol, 2021, 27(2): 26-6.

Han Z, Jiang K, Peng F, et al. The Philippines’ hedging strategy against China in the South China Sea dispute: Based on the human-ocean regional system[J]. Marine Policy, 2023, 15(1): 105-578.

Qin B, Huang L. Reframing opponents in news translation: a case study of the Sino-Philippine South China Sea Dispute[J]. Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies, 2021, 8(2): 130-147.

Castro R C D. From appeasement to soft balancing: the duterte administration’s shifting policy on the South China Sea imbroglio[J]. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 2022, 49(1): 35-61.

Di Domenico G, Sit J, Ishizaka A, et al. Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 12(4): 329-341.

Vraga E K, Tully M, Maksl A, et al. Theorizing news literacy behaviors[J]. Communication Theory, 2021, 31(1): 1-21.

Liu R, Jia C, Vosoughi S. A transformer-based framework for neutralizing and reversing the political polarity of news articles[J]. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2021, 5(1): 1-26.

Gao Y, Zeng G. Exploring linguistic features, ideologies, and critical thinking in Chinese news comments[J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2021, 8(1): 1-8.

Ng L H X, Taeihagh A. How does fake news spread? Understanding pathways of disinformation spread through APIs[J]. Policy & Internet, 2021, 13(4): 560-585.

Scheibenzuber C, Hofer S, Nistor N. Designing for fake news literacy training: A problem-based undergraduate online-course[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021, 12(1): 106-796.

Bryanov K, Vziatysheva V. Determinants of individuals’ belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(6): 653-717.

Abreu R L, Townsend D, Mitchell Y L, et al. LGBTQ qualitative and mixed methods research in counseling psychology: A content analysis[J]. The Counseling Psychologist, 2022, 50(5): 708-737.

Pradana F A, Suprayogi S. CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON CHINESE AND AMERICAN NEWS WEBSITES REPORTING SOUTH CHINA SEA TERRITORIAL DISPUTE[J]. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 2021, 2(2): 84-92.

Fahad N, Goh K O M, Hossen M I, et al. Stand up Against Bad Intended News: An Approach to Detect Fake News using Machine Learning[J]. Emerging science journal, 2023, 7(4): 1247-1259.

Pakhlova G. News on the neutron structure[J]. Nature Physics, 2021, 17(11): 1196-1197.

Albahar M. A hybrid model for fake news detection: Leveraging news content and user comments in fake news[J]. IET Information Security, 2021, 15(2): 169-177.

Culpeper J. Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast[J]. Journal of pragmatics, 2021, 17(9): 4-11.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29
Loading...