Collective Interest Integration and County Governance for Common Prosperity: Evidence from a County in China

Collective Interest Integration and County Governance for Common Prosperity: Evidence from a County in China

Authors

  • Yingyue Tang School of Economics and Management, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi, China
  • Ling Zhou School of Economics and Management, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66069/ojspub.25360706

Keywords:

Common prosperity, County-level collective interest integration, Rural revitalization, New-type urbanization

Abstract

Common prosperity has emerged as a major policy objective in China, highlighting the need for effective governance mechanisms that promote coordinated regional development and equitable benefit sharing. County-level collective interest integration plays a critical role in aligning the interests of governments, collective organizations, enterprises, and residents to support sustainable local development. Using County A in China as an illustrative case, this study examines the governance mechanisms and institutional arrangements through which collective interest integration has been achieved. Drawing on a qualitative case study approach, the analysis focuses on four key dimensions: resource allocation, industrial collaboration, public service provision, and ecological governance. The findings demonstrate how coordinated governance and cross-sector collaboration contribute to balancing multiple stakeholder interests while fostering inclusive local development. The study extends the understanding of collective interest integration within the context of county governance and offers practical insights for regions seeking to strengthen collaborative governance and advance common prosperity.

References

Fan, S., Kanbur, R., & Zhang, X. (2011). China’s regional disparities: Experience and policy. World Development, 39(10), 1786-1797.

Long, H., Zou, J., & Liu, Y. (2009). Differentiation of rural development driven by industrialization and urbanization in eastern coastal China. Habitat International, 33(4), 454-462.

Chen, M., Liu, W., & Lu, D. (2016). Challenges and the way forward in China’s new-type urbanization. Land Use Policy, 55, 334-339.

He, C., & Pan, F. (2010). Economic transition, dynamic externalities and city-industry growth in China. Urban Studies, 47(1), 121-144.

Li, Y., Long, H., & Liu, Y. (2015). Spatio-temporal pattern of China’s rural development: A rurality index perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 38, 12-26.

Li, Y., & Westlund, H. (2018). The impact of urbanization on regional economic growth in China. Regional Studies, 52(10), 1380-1391.

Kanbur, R., Wang, C., & Zhang, X. (2021). The great Chinese inequality turnaround. Journal of Comparative Economics, 49(2), 467-482.

Rozelle, S., & Swinnen, J. F. M. (2004). Success and failure of reform: Insights from the transition of agriculture. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(2), 404-456.

Deng, X., Huang, J., Rozelle, S., & Uchida, E. (2008). Growth, population and industrialization, and urban land expansion of China. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(1), 96-115.

Liu, Y., & Wang, J. (2019). Rural land engineering and poverty alleviation in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 154-162.

Wang, Y., & Long, H. (2021). The process and driving forces of rural restructuring in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(6), 869-888.

Peng, X. (2011). China’s demographic history and future challenges. Science, 333(6042), 581-587.

Liu, J., Yang, W., & Li, S. (2018). Framework for integrating regional development and ecological conservation. Ecological Economics, 148, 85-95.

Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1), 1-33.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...