When Investment Meets Competition: The Logic and Responses of Product Market Structure Evolution in the AI Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66069/ojspub.26820806Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence Investment, Product Market Competition, Inverted U-Shaped Effect, Data Positive Feedback, Competitive BoundaryAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) investment is fundamentally reshaping the landscape of product market competition, yet its systematic impact and underlying mechanisms remain inadequately theorized. Based on the practices of China’s A-share listed companies, this paper develops a comprehensive theoretical framework from both supply-side capability reconstruction and demand-side structural transformation perspectives to analyze how AI investment influences product market competition. The study yields three key findings. First, AI investment fundamentally transforms firms’ competitive strategy sets and capability boundaries through three channels: reducing marginal costs, enhancing demand forecasting accuracy, and expanding product functional spaces. Second, the intrinsic characteristics of AI—including increasing returns to scale in data, algorithmic black boxes, and cross-scenario knowledge transfer capabilities—drive the competitive boundaries of product markets to shift from the traditional two-dimensional “product-geography” definition toward a multidimensional “scenario-time-ecosystem” structure. Third, the relationship between AI investment and competition intensity follows an inverted U-shaped pattern, with the inflection point determined by the relative dynamics between the intensity of data-driven positive feedback and user multi-homing costs. Further analysis reveals that supply-side R&D transformation barriers and demand-side financing constraints constitute dual dilemmas that may accelerate market concentration toward leading platforms. The theoretical contribution of this paper lies in incorporating the competitive effects of AI investment into an inverted U-shaped dynamic framework while explicitly distinguishing supply-side capability mechanisms from demand-side structural mechanisms. These conclusions provide theoretical foundations and decision-making references for product market competition governance, digital antitrust policy formulation, and corporate AI investment strategies in the AI era.
References
Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., Gerbert, P., & Reeves, M. (2017). Reshaping business with artificial intelligence: Closing the gap between ambition and action. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(1), 1-17.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Krakowski, S., Luger, J., & Raisch, S. “Artificial Intelligence and the Changing Sources of Competitive Advantage” [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2022, 44(6): 1425–1452.
OECD (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Competitive Dynamics in Downstream Markets. OECD Publishing.
Calvano, E., Calzolari, G., Denicolò, V., and Pastorello, S. (2020) “Artificial Intelligence, Algorithmic Pricing, and Collusion.” American Economic Review, 110, 3267–3297.
Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K. N., and Hamouda, A. M. “A Methodological Approach to Assessing : The Current State of Organizations for AI-Based Digital Transformation” [J]. Applied System Innovation, 2024, 7(1): 14.
Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., Goldfarb, A., et al. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda [C]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019.
Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., et al. How Artificial Intelligence Will Change the Future of Marketing [J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2020, 52: 4–14.
Dwivedi Y K, Hughes L, Ismagilova E, et al. Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Emerging Challenges, Opportunities, and Agenda for Research, Practice, and Policy [J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2021, 57:102194.
Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, *120*(2), 701–728.
Belhadi, A., Mani, V., Kamble, S. S., et al. Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the influence of supply chain dynamism: an empirical investigation [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2024, 333(2): 627–652.
Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1990). Herd behavior and investment. American Economic Review, 80(3), 465-479.
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58.
Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995). Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 115-152.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D'Este, P.,... & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442.
Purtova, N. (2022). The law of everything: Broad concept of personal data and future of EU data protection law. Computer Law & Security Review, 44, 105671.
Lundvall, B. Å. (Ed.). (2010). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Anthem Press.