The Study of Poetical Style Attribution and Classification of Poetic Subgenres in the Tang and Song Poetry

The Study of Poetical Style Attribution and Classification of Poetic Subgenres in the Tang and Song Poetry

Authors

  • Lianlian Luo School of Mathematics, Chengdu Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Fengjiao Gong School of Mathematics, Chengdu Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Hang Zuo School of Mathematics, Chengdu Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/jsshl.2023.06(06).04

Keywords:

Tang and Song Poetry Styles, Logistic Regression Model, k-Means Clustering Model, Simulated Annealing Algorithm, TOPSIS with Entropy Weight Adjustment

Abstract

The literary styles of Tang and Song poetry exhibit noticeable differences, at times directly denoting two distinct categories of poetic styles. However, sometimes the poetic style of Tang Dynasty poets may be more akin to Song poetry, and the poetic style of Song Dynasty poets may lean closer to that of the Tang Dynasty. This study employs quantitative analysis and establishes mathematical models to investigate these differences. Methods: Firstly, this paper employs a logistic regression model based on the simulated annealing algorithm to classify the style of poets and determine their style affiliation. Secondly, using the k-means clustering model, Tang and Song poetic styles are further refined into subcategories. Finally, scores are computed using the TOPSIS model modified by the entropy weight method to select the most representative poems and poets within each style. Conclusions: 1) The model identifies the style affiliation of Pei Che and Liu Yizhi as Song poetry style and Tang poetry style, respectively, with an accuracy rate of 83.3%. 2) The Tang poetic style is divided into three categories, and the Song poetic style is divided into five categories, with the first subcategory of Tang poetry including poems like "Passing Jin Yang Palace" and "Spring Platform Views." 3) The most representative poems include "Sending Xue Shaoqing to Qingyang" and "Introducing the Ballad for the Feast."

References

Fang Minjiang, Huy Dinh Tran Ngoc. Building a cross-border e-commerce talent training platform based on logistic regression model[J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2023, 34(2).

Rigon Tommaso, Aliverti Emanuele. Conjugate priors and bias reduction for logistic regression models[J]. Statistics and Probability Letters, 2023, 202.

Eshari Fatemeh, Momeni Fahime, Nezhadi Amirreza Faraj, Shemehsavar Soudabeh, HabibiRezaei Mehran. Prediction of protein aggregation propensity employing SqFt-based logistic regression model.[J]. International journal of biological macromolecules, 2023, 249.

Zihao Deng, Zhaoyang Han, Chuan Ma, Ming Ding, Long Yuan, Chunpeng Ge, Zhe Liu. Vertical Federated Unlearning on the Logistic Regression Model[J]. Electronics, 2023, 12(14).

Soh Chin Gi, Zhu Ying, Toh Tin Lam. A regularised logistic regression model with structured features for classification of geographical origin in olive oils[J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2023, 237.

Li Jingqi, Li Junlin, Wang Dan, Mao Chengxiong, Guan Zhitao, Liu Zhichao, Du Miaomiao, Qi Yuanzhuo, Wang Lexiang, Liu Wenge, Tang Pengfei. Hierarchical and partitioned planning strategy for closed-loop devices in low-voltage distribution network based on improved KMeans partition method[J]. Energy Reports, 2023, 9(S10).

Liang Ping, Al Bayatti Hilal. Automatic Knowledge Integration Method of English Translation Corpus Based on Kmeans Algorithm[J]. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 2023, 8(1).

Gao Xu, Ding Xiaoming, Han Tingting, Kang Yueyuan. Analysis of influencing factors on excellent teachers' professional growth based on DB-Kmeans method[J]. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2022, 2022(1).

Du Wensheng, Zhu Yanjun, Li Shuangshuang, Liu Ping. Spikelets detection of table grape before thinning based on improved YOLOV5s and Kmeans under the complex environment[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 203.

He Junzeng, Jiang Dong, Zhang Dahai, Li Jian, Fei Qingguo. Interval model validation for rotor support system using Kmeans Bayesian method[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 70.

Chen Cheng, Ran Desheng, Yang Yanlin, Hou Hetao, Peng Changle. TOPSIS based multi-fidelity Co-Kriging for multiple response prediction of structures with uncertainties through real-time hybrid simulation[J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 280.

Jin Guangying. Selection of virtual team members for smart port development projects through the application of the direct and indirect uncertain TOPSIS method[J]. Expert Systems With Applications, 2023, 217.

Zhao Mengdie, Li Jinhang, Zhang Yuansheng, Han Yuping, Wei Jinhai. Water cycle health assessment based on combined weight and hook trapezoid fuzzy TOPSIS model: A case study of nine provinces in the Yellow River basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 147.

Kanwal Salma, Farooq Yasmeen, Siddiqui Muhammad Kamran, Idrees Nazeran, Razzaque Asima, Petros Fikre Bogale. Study the Behavior of Drug Structures via Chemical Invariants Using TOPSIS and SAW[J]. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2023, 2023.

de Lima Silva Diogo Ferreira, Ferreira Luciano, de Almeida Filho Adiel Teixeira. Preference disaggregation on TOPSIS for sorting applied to an economic freedom assessment[J]. Expert Systems With Applications, 2023, 215.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29
Loading...