Research on the Local Knowledge and Its Cultural Value in Village History Museums: A Case Study of Liugong Village History Museum in Guilin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jsshl.2024.07(02).17Keywords:
Local Knowledge, Village History Museum, Cultural ValueAbstract
This paper employs the theory of local knowledge, taking the Liugong Village History Museum in Guilin as the research object. It classifies the local knowledge in the village history museum into explicit and tacit types. The exertion of this local knowledge is closely related to the dynamic behavior, historical induction, and local context throughout the museum's development process. The cultural value of the village history museum lies in promoting local knowledge. From this perspective, the museum plays a role in localizing rural culture, creating cultural landmarks, and constructing a folk discourse system, thus becoming a "new" coordinate in the context of rural cultural revitalization.
References
Zhao, K., Dan, L., & Ting, D. (2021). A discussion of the realistic significance and paths of rural revitalization promoted by soul-nurturing culture. Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Mental Health and Humanities Education (ICMHHE 2021).
Wang, S., & Nie, Y. (2022). Publicity of local knowledge: The due meaning of rural cultural revitalization and its implementation. Library, (5), 1-6+31.
Huang, W. (2023). Local knowledge driving the revitalization of rural culture: Historical logic, value coexistence, and system reconstruction. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 44(11), 186-193.
Geertz, C. (2000). Local Knowledge. Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Press.
Warren, D. M., Slikkerveer, L. J., & Brokensha, D. (1995). The cultural dimension of development: Indigenous knowledge systems. Philippine Political Science Journal, 8, 34-41.
Sheng, X. M. (2000). The construction of local knowledge. Philosophical Research, (12), 36-44, 76-77.
Wu, T. (2007). On two kinds of "local knowledge"—Furthermore a review of viewpoints from Geertz and Rouse. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, (11), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2007.11.024
Luo, K., Yang, T., & Peng, B. (2016). Analysis on social and cultural reasons of the untruthfulness of value assessment on indigenous knowledge. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 32(7), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2016.07.014
Zhou, Y., & Li, W. (2019). Village history museums: A cultural force in rural China. Library Forum, 39(11), 72-78.
Li, & Yuanxing. (2008). Traditional resources in the reconstruction of the contemporary chinese rural community: the huizhou village as an example. Social Sciences in China, 29(1), 193-200.
Pan, J. (2020). Re-embedding the countryside: Rural construction in China during the modernization process. Beijing: China Renmin University Press. Page 313.
Gao Bo.(2020).The Effect of Memory Construction of Cultural Landmarks on Urban Development.(eds.)
He, P. (2022). Three models of cultural subject return in public folk custom practices. Journal of Primitive Ethnology and Culture, 14(1), 110-120, 155-156.
General Office of the Communist Party of China, & General Office of the State Council. (2022). The General Offices of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council issue the "14th Five-Year Plan for Cultural Development." Gazette of the State Council of the People's Republic of China, (24), 4-22.