Definition of the Concept of Administrative Disputes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jsshl.2023.06(04).23Keywords:
administrative disputes, prevention and resolution of administrative disputes, externalization of administrative disputesAbstract
Administrative dispute is a fundamental concept that requires clarification in the realm of administrative law theory. However, there is a lack of well-defined definitions of administrative dispute in this field, and varying perspectives exist. This paper aims to address this gap by establishing a definition of administrative disputes based on four key elements: the subject, object, motivation for formation, and external manifestation of such disputes. By doing so, this paper seeks to make a modest contribution to the prevention and resolution of administrative disputes.
References
Fan Yu: Theory and Practice of Dispute Resolution, [M] Tsinghua University Press, 2007 edition.
Tang Weijian et al: The Theory of Group Dispute Litigation Resolution Mechanism, [M] Peking University Press, 2008 edition.
Gu Peidong, Social Conflict and Litigation Mechanism, Sichuan People's Publishing House, [M] 1991 edition.
He Rong: Research on Administrative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms, People's University of China Press, [M] 2008 ed.
Jiang Ming'an, Editor-in-Chief: Administrative Law and Administrative Litigation Law (5th ed.), [M] Peking University Press and Higher Education Press, 2011 ed.
Yu Lingyun: Administrative Contract Theory (2nd ed.), [M] Renmin University of China Press, 2006 ed.
LAN.R. McNeil: The New Social Contract, [M] China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2004 edition.
Yang Shuxiang: On Administrative Disputes - On the Distinction between Administrative Disputes and Civil Disputes, [J] in Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law, 2004 (1).
Cai Shipeng: ""Administrative Dispute Resolution Mechanism under the Perspective of Sociology of Law"", [J] in China Law Journal, 2006, No. 3.
Huang Xuexian: ""On the Third Person in Administrative Behavior"", [J] in Contemporary Jurisprudence, 2006, March.