Forest Thought in the Stage of Forest Industrial Utilization

Forest Thought in the Stage of Forest Industrial Utilization

Authors

  • Wenyue Wei Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/jsshl.2024.07(02).02

Keywords:

Objectification, Mechanization, Anthropocentrism, Empirical methods, Laboratory

Abstract

The rise of modern science has brought about "The Disenchantment of the World" summarized by Max Weber. Disenchantment means a fundamental change in the way of understanding the world. Scientific discourse with rationalization as its essential feature has replaced religious discourse with faith as its essential feature and has become the most dominant world view. Disenchantment shows the basic characteristics and trends of the overall development of society. It strips away the mysterious meaning of the world by criticizing the construction of the world by the subjective spirit, and uses scientific and technological rationality to present the structure and appearance of the world. In this process, the world becomes an object to be understood and transformed by "I", rather than a community that shares weal and woe. Descartes' metaphysical dualism and mechanism established the main view of nature at this stage. Nature has become a huge and complex mechanical system, and mathematics and geometry are the most effective tools to describe mechanical systems. In an era when the world has become a machine, forests have also lost their subject status and become objects to be analyzed mathematically; at this stage, forests exist as "resources" in more and more places. Then people become users and beneficiaries of resources, and forests become the objects of human management and use. Scientific methods have become the main method in all fields of society. Forests that conform to mathematical ideals have become standard forests. Forests that were originally wild have become huge laboratories, filled with mathematical rules and human utility.

References

(Ying) Colin Wude, Wu Guosheng. The idea of nature [M]. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 1999. Page4,6,9.

Geory Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Lecture on the History of Philosophy: Vol. 4 [M]. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1981. Page 3.

King Descartes, Taiqing. Talk about the methods [M]. Beijing: Business Press, 2000. Page 7,20,49.

Miao Litian, Ancient Greek Philosophy, Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 1989, pp. 164-165.

Tian Song. Natural History: A path by which to save the soul [J]. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Sciences edition).2011,33(06),50-52

Zhu Yongjie, Zhou Boling. A Brief History of the World of Forestry [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017. p. 23,26,28,.

(American) James C Scott by JAMES C SCOTT Wang Xiaoyi. National perspective on how programs that tried to improve the human condition failed = Seeing like a state how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed [M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2012. page 3,7,10.

AGNOLETTI M, ANDERSON (EDITORS) S.Methods and Approaches in Forest History (IUFRO Research Series, Volume 3)[M/OL].First.CABI, 2000[2023-03-27].http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=4820a537e3d993617e66fd2f161018ce. This example in North America originates on page 41 of this book.

Wu Guosheng. The landscape of the world - the metaphysical foundation of modern mathematical experimental science [J/OL]. Science and Society, 2016,6 (1): 43-73. DOI:10.19524/j.cnki.10-1009/g3.2016.01.005.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-25
Loading...