Research on the Influence of Blended Curriculum Teaching Evaluation Design on Learning Motivation--Based on Control Value Theory

Research on the Influence of Blended Curriculum Teaching Evaluation Design on Learning Motivation--Based on Control Value Theory

Authors

  • Huan Xu School of Marketing and Logistics Management, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China; National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center for Economic Management, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Jianing Li National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center for Economic Management, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/jsshl.2023.06(06).09

Keywords:

Blended Teaching, Learning Enthusiasm, Teaching Evaluation Design, Control Value

Abstract

Blended learning environments bring new dimensions to the teaching capabilities of college instructors while also presenting novel challenges. Addressing these challenges requires investigation not only at the theoretical and policy levels but also in terms of individual awareness and practical implementation. Grounded in the control-value theory, this study scrutinizes the teaching evaluation design, control-value assessment, and students' learning motivation in blended courses within the blended online, online, and offline classroom settings. The study aims to explore the intricate relationships among these three components. The findings reveal that the teaching evaluation design of blended curriculum has no direct and significant impact on students' learning motivation in college classrooms. However, it does exert an indirect influence on students' learning motivation through control evaluation and value assessment. The outcomes of this research contribute to enhancing instructors' comprehension of the mechanisms that stimulate students' learning motivation in a blended curriculum context. Subsequently, it offers valuable insights for interventions to enhance students' learning motivation in college classrooms.

References

Chen C H, Liu T K, Huang K. Scaffolding vocational high school students' computational thinking with cognitive and metacognitive prompts in learning about programmable logic controllers[J]. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 2023, 55(3): 527-544.

Doo M Y, Bonk C, Heo H. A meta-analysis of scaffolding effects in online learning in higher education[J]. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2020, 21(3): 60-80.

Arbaugh J B. What might online delivery teach us about blended management education? Prior perspectives and future directions[J]. Journal of management education, 2014, 38(6): 784-817.

Zhai N, Huang Y, Ma X, et al. Can reflective interventions improve students' academic achievement? A meta-analysis[J]. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2023, 49: 101-117.

Pekrun R. The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice[J]. Educational psychology review, 2006, 18: 315-341.

Pekrun, R. & R. Perry. Control-value theory of achievement emotions [M] International Handbook of Emotions in Education. New York: Routledge, 2014: 120-141.

Tynan B, Ryan Y, Lamont‐Mills A. Examining workload models in online and blended teaching[J]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2015, 46(1): 5-15.

Richardson J T E. Face-to-Face versus online tutorial support in distance education: preference, performance, and pass rates in students with disabilities[J]. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 2016, 29(1): 83-90.

Kim J Y, Lim K Y. Promoting learning in online, ill-structured problem solving: The effects of scaffolding type and metacognition level[J]. Computers & Education, 2019, 138: 116-129.

Burke M A, Sass T R. Classroom peer effects and student achievement[J]. Journal of Labor Economics, 2013, 31(1): 51-82.

Chen S, Ouyang F, Jiao P. Promoting student engagement in online collaborative writing through a student‐facing social learning analytics tool[J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2022, 38(1): 192-208.

Larsson K. Understanding and teaching critical thinking—A new approach[J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 2017, 84: 32-42.

Li C. A control–value theory approach to boredom in English classes among university students in China[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2021, 105(1): 317-334.

De Leersnyder J, Kim H S, Mesquita B. My emotions belong here and there: extending the phenomenon of emotional acculturation to heritage culture fit[J]. Cognition and Emotion, 2020, 34(8): 1573-1590.

Pawlak M, Kruk M, Zawodniak J, et al. Investigating factors responsible for boredom in English classes: The case of advanced learners[J]. System, 2020, 91: 102259.

Goodyear V, Dudley D. Understanding what teachers and students do within student-centered physical education models[J]. Quest, 2015, 67(3): 274-289.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29
Loading...